 |
£8bn legal victory for mesothelioma victims |
 |
| Thousands of victims of deadly asbestos dust stand to win compensation
totalling £8billion in the biggest insurance payout over an industrial disease. A landmark House of
Lords ruling yesterday overturned a legal principle that has blocked the claims of workers who
developed mesothelioma cancer and other diseases. |
 |
| Five Law Lords decided that compensation must be paid to victims or their
families in three cases of mesothelioma, a cancer caused by asbestos dust. Lower courts had ruled that
no compensation could be paid because the victims had been exposed to dust while working for more than
one employer. That principle was overturned yesterday. |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| The Law Lords, headed by Lord Bingham, decided that the doctrine of the 'fatal
fibre', used by insurers' lawyers to maintain that no one can say where a mesothelioma victim contracted
his disease, can no longer ward off the duty to pay compensation. |
 |
| Now when a mesothelioma victim has been exposed to asbestos in several
different jobs, the compensation will be divided between the insurers of each employer, based on
how long the mesothelioma sufferer worked for each firm. |
 |
| Lawyers estimated that asbestos claims will cost insurers £8billion. |
|
|
 |
| But the overall cost to insurrers could be much greater because the case
established a principle that could be used by those suffering from other industrial diseases. |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Tobacco firms could find that they will no longer be able to use the defence
that a lung cancer victim had smoked cigarettes produced by several companies. Yesterday, the Law Lords
delivered their ruling in the cases of Judith Fairchild, the widow of Arthur Fairchild from Leeds;
Doreen Fox, the widow of Tom Fox from Liverpool; and Edwin Matthews, a 54-year-old mesothelioma
sufferer from Rochester in Kent. Mrs Fairchild will be paid £191,000 to compensate for the suffering of
her husband, who died in 1996. |
 |
| has been a long wait,' she said. 'I was not very hopeful.' Mr Matthews will
now be paid £155,000 compensation awarded last year but withdrawn after his former employers won an
appeal. The judges gave their decision so that 500 other mesothelioma compensation claims that have
been held back waiting for the outcome of the test case can now go ahead. They will give their reasoning
later. |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Many mesothelioma compensation claims are now expected from former workers in
the construction or shipbuilding industries in which asbestos was widely used until the 1980s. Asbestos
was used in industry because of its fire-resistant properties. It was common in pipes, guttering,
lagging, tiles and cement in buildings and in car brake linings. It was also used in some school
buildings, so children may have been affected. Some 5,000 died of asbestos linked cancers in Britain
last year. The number is expected to rise to 10,000 a year in the next decade. |
 |
| As well as mesothelioma, asbestos causes the chronic lung disease asbestosis
and other debilitating illnesses. John Parker, of the Association of British Insurers, said: 'Insurers
will pay compensation within the law set down today. Insurers reserve for these sorts of claims. 'We
will need to study the details of this ruling very carefully as soon as the reasons for the decision
become available in order to establish the precise parameters of the law. |
 |
| If you have been diagnosed with mesothelioma and would like
some advice, call us on the number below |
|
 |
|
|